Art. 07
Title
Crafting Paveau
DATE
hand-drawn illustrations
phot. katoo peeters
©2025

phot. katoo peeters
©2025
AI generated illustrations
otg
©2025

phot. katoo peeters
©2025
packaging design with ai
There’s this assumption going around that AI makes creative work easy, fast and almost automatic. Well, the new Paveau packaging we designed proves otherwise…
the brief
Working with Paveau glassware, we’ve shaped their packaging over the years with patterns inspired by murals, British textiles, and Japanese aesthetics. When we were asked to design the packaging for the new Swirl Collection, the ambition was clear: stay true to their existing identity, but push it forward into something fresher, sharper, and more refined.
The project started the way most of our work does: with real people. We worked with illustrator Ward Nijs to explore the first visual directions through hand-drawn illustrations. The foundation was right and our ambition clear: to realise this third edition of the PAVEAU packaging entirely by hand.
The illustrative direction was inspired by toile de Jouy, an 18th-century French textile tradition in which imagery was not decorative, but narrative. Printed in a single pigment on cotton, built from extremely refined line work, with scenes flowing into one another rather than repeating.
It was precisely here that we reached a limit. The line work did not achieve the level of refinement we were searching for. So rather than forcing it, we chose to open up the process.
Human Decisions, Digital Tools
We took the original illustrations and started reworking them, using AI as a tool. Not to replace the drawings, but to push them further. To see how certain lines could soften, how details could get richer, how the look and feel could shift without losing what made it work in the first place.
This wasn’t a one-click thing. It was slow and sometimes very frustrating. Honestly, AI does some strange things at times. Each illustration got treated individually. Each detail rendered, adjusted, scrapped, reworked. Again and again. Some parts worked right away but most didn’t. In the process, AI became a sketching partner that talked back, but never the one making decisions. Nothing was generated and left as is.
“The work is about choices.”
— Rick Rubin

ami paris store
©.OTG
2026
layer by layer
Everything came together manually in the end. We built it in Photoshop almost like a collage, placing each element consciously, layer by layer. What looks cohesive now is the result of hundreds, maybe thousands, of small decisions. Using AI actually made the process slower, not faster. But speed was never the point. What mattered was keeping control.
We wanted a feeling that human hands were present at every step, even when a machine briefly stepped in. We think this distinction matters. AI can help you explore faster, but it can’t replace a real person. It can’t tell you when something feels finished, or when holding back is better than adding more. That’s still on us.
consensus
This project reminded us that good branding doesn’t come from tools. It comes from the right hands, a clear vision, and time. Time to test, to repeat, to step back and return with fresh eyes. We used AI, sure. But every decision that mattered was made by a person.
topical references
We’d like to offer you, the reader, a few additional references that explore this topic even further. It remains an interesting and ongoing discussion within design and branding. Avoiding it feels like avoiding the inevitable, so we prefer to engage with it and shape our own perspective.
Air’s open letter
We appreciated this handwritten letter by New York-based platform Air. Their message is clear: AI won’t replace creative work.
In the letter, Air argues that creation depends on the complexity of the human mind, and its instinct to question, doubt, and debate.
Air is a creative management platform that recently introduced “Creative Director AI,” a tool that helps automate production tasks, resize content, and suggest edits in line with a brand.
At the same time, they underline a more essential idea: AI can generate, but humans decide what matters. That thinking runs through their broader campaign, including a full-page ad in The New York Times, where they reflect on the role of AI in creative work.
barcelona based school explores AI
We also came across an interesting perspective in a recent article by It’s Nice That, featuring LABASAD.
It explores how generative AI is reshaping the creative industry, not by replacing creatives, but by changing how they work. Rather than positioning AI as a threat, the focus shifts to collaboration, where AI becomes a tool to expand ideas, streamline workflows, and open up new creative possibilities.
At the same time, the article acknowledges the tension many creatives feel. AI can easily produce large volumes of content, often leading to concerns around originality, authorship, and a growing sense of sameness in output.
The takeaway is nuanced: the real challenge isn’t the technology itself, but how it’s used. When approached critically and intentionally, AI has the potential to support creative thinking rather than flatten it.










